The Trump administration has launched a sweeping health-focused food policy under the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) initiative. Central to this effort is a voluntary pledge by over 40 U.S. ice cream manufacturers—representing more than 90% of national sales—to phase out seven petroleum-based artificial food dyes by the end of 2027. The initiative, formally announced on July 14, 2025, aims to eliminate synthetic additives from widely consumed dairy desserts in response to growing public health concerns and consumer demand for cleaner ingredients.
‍

Key Details of the Initiative
‍

• Scope and Timeline: The pledge, coordinated by the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA), targets artificial dyes in ice cream and frozen dairy desserts made with real milk. Companies plan to fully phase out Red No. 3, Red No. 40, Green No. 3, Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, Yellow No. 5, and Yellow No. 6 by December 31, 2027. Some reports suggest 2028 as a potential deadline for specific products.
  ‍
• Health Concerns: Scientific studies, particularly involving children, have raised concerns about synthetic dyes contributing to hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral effects. While the FDA maintains these dyes are safe within regulated limits, the administration has cited the need to reduce potential risks. Red No. 3 was banned earlier in January 2025 following rodent studies showing carcinogenic effects.
  ‍
• FDA-Approved Alternatives: To support reformulation, the FDA has greenlit natural color additives such as gardenia blue (genipin), galdieria extract blue, butterfly pea flower extract, and calcium phosphate. These substitutes align with the administration's messaging: real food without chemicals.
  ‍

Industry-Wide Impact and Commitments
‍

The ice cream sector is only the beginning. The MAHA initiative has prompted broader reformulation across the food industry:
‍

• Steak & Shake moved to 100% all-natural beef tallow and replaced its “buttery blend,” which contained seed oils, with 100% Grade A Wisconsin butter.
• McCormick announced it will drop certain food dyes from its products.
• PepsiCo announced it will remove artificial ingredients from popular food items — including Lay’s and Tostitos chips — by the end of the year.
• In-N-Out announced it will remove synthetic food dyes and artificial flavors from its menu items.
• Tyson Foods eliminated synthetic dyes in its food products.
• Mars removed titanium dioxide from its Skittles product.
• Sam’s Club committed to removing 40 harmful ingredients — including artificial colors, additives, dyes, and high-fructose corn syrup — from its private-label products.
• Kraft-Heinz announced it will remove artificial dyes from its U.S. products.
• General Mills announced it will remove artificial dyes from its U.S. cereals and all foods served in K-12 schools.
• Nestlé announced it will remove all petroleum-based food dyes from its food and beverage products.
• Conagra Foods announced it will remove certain color additives from its frozen products, no longer offer products with artificial dyes in K-12 schools, and stop using artificial dyes in the manufacturing of its products.
• JM Smucker announced it will remove synthetic colors from its consumer food products.
• Hershey announced it will remove synthetic dyes from its snacks.
• Consumer Brands announced it will urge its members to remove artificial colors in food and beverage products served in schools.

‍

Controversy and Scientific Debate
‍

• Voluntary vs. Mandated Reform: The Trump administration's strategy relies on voluntary corporate compliance, rather than regulatory mandates. Critics argue this weakens enforcement and could lead to inconsistent results.
  ‍
• Mixed Evidence: While some studies suggest behavioral issues linked to food dyes, especially in children, regulators like the FDA and EFSA have historically deemed them safe. Experts warn against policy decisions not firmly rooted in human clinical data.
  ‍
• Market Pressure and Politics: The reform wave appears driven not just by health concerns, but also by pressure from both federal leadership and changing consumer preferences. The involvement of figures like HHS Secretary RFK Jr. and USDA Secretary Brooke Rollins, both known for anti-establishment views, has injected a populist tone.

‍

The MAHA initiative represents a significant inflection point in U.S. food policy, signaling an increased willingness from the federal government to shape nutritional standards through influence and corporate pledges rather than regulation. While the scientific consensus on artificial dyes remains inconclusive, the market is clearly shifting toward natural ingredients. Ice cream is just the beginning. The success of this initiative will hinge on consumer awareness, continued corporate participation, and whether the FDA follows up with binding regulation in the years ahead.

‍

Watch the video here: